The most common mistakes of companies make on Wikipedia

The most common mistakes of companies make on Wikipedia

Table of content

Wikipedia is the world's most important online encyclopedia. With over six million English articles, it is the leading source of information for many people. Therefore, it is crucial for large organizations to maintain and update their Wikipedia page well. As a press spokesperson, you are responsible for ensuring that your company is well represented on Wikipedia.

This blog post aims to highlight common mistakes PR departments can make on Wikipedia:

Use of promotional language

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising portal. Companies should be aware that promotional language is not permitted on Wikipedia pages. Rather than subjective claims, companies should focus on factual and neutral representation, and avoid statements such as "We are the leading company in our industry" or terms like "launch," "entrepreneurial spirit," or "full-service provider". Instead, objectively showcase your company's performance through facts and data.

Not using high-quality secondary sources

Another common mistake press spokespersons make on Wikipedia is editing pages without high-quality sources or references. Wikipedia is a community-driven platform that relies on the use of evidence. This means that any changes you want to make to your company's Wikipedia page should be substantiated with meaningful sources.

As a rule of thumb: Information can only be entered into the article if there is reliable, secondary source independent of the subject, (e.g., a journalistic source) that fully supports the information.

Ignoring Wikipedia's Terms of Use, policies, or guidelines

Wikipedia has a large set of policies and guidelines created by the community to ensure the quality of articles on the platform. It is important that you familiarize yourself with these rules and ensure that you adhere to them when making changes to your company's Wikipedia page. Violating a policy could result in the deletion of your changes or, ultimately, your entire Wikipedia presence.

Wikipedians are anything but lenient when it comes to unknowingly breaking rules.

Lack of ability to be neutral

To address the elephant in the room: Press spokespersons often make the mistake of incorporating their own viewpoint too strongly into their company's Wikipedia page. It is generally good that they are convinced of their company.

However, it is important on Wikipedia to be independent and objective, ensuring that your company's portrayal on Wikipedia maintains a neutral perspective. The tone of an article should always be factual and contain no evaluative statements unless supported by reliable, independent, secondary sources.

Neglecting updates

Another important point that press spokespersons often overlook on Wikipedia is the regular updating of their company's Wikipedia page. The information on your Wikipedia page should always be up-to-date so that the readers of your page stay informed. Every interest group keeps an eye on your Wikipedia entry, whether they are applicants, customers, employees, or organizations even like the tax office.

Therefore, you should always ensure that you make updates not only when a crisis occurs or something changes and you need to react to a change, but regularly and proactively.

How we can help you as a leading Wikipedia agency

Your Wikipedia page is an important part of your online presence as an organization. It is crucial that you take care of it and ensure that it is factual, objective, and up-to-date. With us by your side, you avoid the above mistakes and instead work on creating a high-quality and informative Wikipedia page for your company.

Content written by

Simon Wohlleb

Managing Director of Augusta Atlantic.

Notability Check

We check your topic discreetly and free of charge

Please fill out the following form to let us check the notability of your topic or subject. We will then get in touch with you.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

1. NOTABILITY CHECK - You fill out the relevance check form. We will carry out a free notability check and give you feedback in each case.

2. INITIAL CONVERSATION - If the topic is relevant according to the Wikipedia criteria, we will send you an invitation for a free initial consultation. We will show you our approach with concrete examples and then prepare a non-binding offer.

3. ONBOARDING - During onboarding, you will get to know your personal project manager, who will listen to your wishes and ideas and work with you to develop the optimal solution for your article.

4. TEXT CREATION - Our experienced authors create an encyclopaedically flawless draft article within 10 working days based on the jointly developed solution and research the crucial information themselves. Only after your final approval will the article be published in accordance with Wikipedia's terms of use.

5. CONCLUSION AND SUPPORT - You will be supported by us for a fixed period of time after the article has been published online, during which time we will be available to you at all times.